Controlling billionaires. Correction. Sanctions 10* more expensive for EU than the war. Kim into WHO
Hur kontrollera miljardärer. Rättelse. Sanktionerna 10* dyrare för EU än kriget. Kim in i WHO
🇸🇪 Dagens svenska video. (Bitchute)
🇸🇪 På svenska längst ner 👇
Today’s English video (Rumble)
RFKjr Twitter spaces Monday 2 PM EST
20:00 CET.
Josep Borrell admitted
Europe will pay 10 times more for sanctions against Russia than for supporting Ukraine. Maybe payback time from EU to the people?
Russia spends 3% of GDP on the special military operation in Ukraine.
Compare that to that most countries spend about 10-30% of GDP on toxic crap, corruption and useless organizations - Russia included. EU only has access to 1% of GDP, and is way more effective and slim than the Russian or US federations; EU member states though… That is up for debate.
Z noted: When Blinken said: Russia is the number 2 military in Ukraine could be implying that US military is in Ukraine.
I can believe that. People do almost magically reveal their inner thoughts by the words and phrases they say. If you just try to mindread them - You can't read people's minds, but if your mindreading predicts well, you have a useful skill.
Trump congratulates Kim Jong Un on North Korean election to WHO executive board
Trump is just killing it by being friendly to Kim Jong Un, and Scott Adams has a good take on that: Trump likes Kim which is good for everyone, and Trump hates WHO. So Trump’s friend Kim in WHO…
I’ll only add: Unless you can appoint Elon Musk to WHO, you have to appoint the other rocket guy! Or his minister, of course:
The North Korean Ministry of Public Health's Dr. Jong Min Pak has been seated on the WHO's executive board with a term set to last until 2026.
Maybe big pharma hasn’t been able to corrupt Dr Jong Min Pak yet!
Evil mastermind that wants to enslave humanity, or a guy addicted to get dopamine kicks by doing shit that people like?
OK, we should not trust Elon Musk, but there is no way anyone can convince me he isn’t addicted to Twitter like a (something obscene) to (something even more obscene).
Reframe: Make Elon laugh, and you control the world.
16 intelligence agencies were not mentioned in this comic I was told to not share non-redacted:
🇸🇪🇸🇪🇸🇪🇸🇪🇸🇪🇸🇪🇸🇪🇸🇪🇸🇪🇸🇪🇸🇪🇸🇪🇸🇪🇸🇪🇸🇪🇸🇪🇸🇪🇸🇪🇸🇪🇸🇪🇸🇪🇸🇪🇸🇪🇸🇪🇸🇪🇸🇪🇸🇪🇸🇪🇸🇪🇸🇪🇸🇪🇸🇪🇸🇪
RFKjr Twitter spaces kl 20 svensk tid
Josep Borrell erkände
Europa kommer att betala 10 gånger mer för sanktioner mot Ryssland än för stöd till Ukraina. Kanske dags för EU att betala tillbaka till folket?
Ryssland spenderar bara 3% på den speciella operationen i Ukraina
Nordkorea in i WHO
Nu har Kim Jong Un fått in sin Dr. Jong Min Pak i styrelsen för WHO, så nu blir det raketfart på WHO - Trump säger det är pruttbra. Kanske Dr Jong Min Pak inte ännu blivit korrumperad av big pharma.
Varför skulle jag lägga märke till detta?
I det moderna svenska språket är vi väldigt noga med att inte upprepa "inte". Så på vad vi tycker är korkad engelska "I ain't got no money" (jag har inte inga pengar... Så jag har pengar?!?):
Men på spanska kan man göra meningar med 5 negationer, men det betyder intAll the useful stuff you need to know is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.e att du behöver räkna dem för att se vad meningen betyder, utan bara att det betyder "VERKLIGEN INTE!".
Att upprepa ord ord som verkligen verkligen behövs är bara övertydligt och att att upprepa ett litet ord gör inget, i min arroganta uppfattning.